Skip to content

v22.0 Integration Feasibility Decision Record

This document records the formal Gate 0 integration feasibility outcome.

Related:

  1. v22.0 Approval Checklist
  2. v22.0 Non-Duplicate Value Decision Plan
  3. v22.0 Gate 0 User Action Tracker
  4. v22.0 Gate 0 Evidence Intake Pack

Decision Metadata

Field Value
Decision Outcome (go | conditional | blocked) conditional
Decision Date 2026-03-09
Decision Owner jer
Redline Checklist Version v1
Review Participants Product owner, engineering lead, governance reviewer (internal pass)

Redline Checklist

All must be marked pass for outcome go.

Redline ID Requirement Status (pass | fail | unknown) Evidence
R1 No raw user query text may be shared with 211 pathways pass v22 constraints + internal schemas reject query-text payload fields
R2 No forced user-identifying telemetry transfer pass Pilot event contracts are code-based outcome enums; no direct personal identifiers required
R3 No contractual term requiring re-identification capability pass Conditional control C1 requires legal clause review before any external activation
R4 No retention requirement that conflicts with privacy-first constraints pass Conditional control C2 requires retention clause + data minimization sign-off
R5 Integration path supports auditable consent/privacy boundaries pass Decision log + approval checklist + redline checklist are explicit and versioned

Decision Logic

  1. go: all redlines pass; no unresolved legal/privacy blockers.
  2. conditional: one or more redlines require compensating controls, but safe path exists.
  3. blocked: no telemetry-safe path exists or blocker cannot be mitigated in Phase 0.

Compensating Controls (Required if Conditional)

Control ID Control Description Owner Due Date Verification Method
C1 Complete legal review of candidate partner terms; reject any re-identification or telemetry clauses jer 2026-03-21 Linked legal memo + explicit R3 clause check in this document
C2 Complete privacy retention mapping for any integration payload and publish retention limits jer 2026-03-21 Privacy review artifact + updated redline evidence links for R4
C3 Keep integration endpoint execution disabled unless C1/C2 are marked complete jer 2026-03-21 Gate note in approval checklist + release checklist verification entry

Control Status Tracker

Control ID Status (pending | complete) Evidence Link Last Reviewed
C1 pending v22.0 Control C1 Legal Review 2026-03-09
C2 complete v22.0 Control C2 Privacy Retention Mapping 2026-03-29
C3 complete v22.0 Control C3 Integration Activation Guard 2026-03-09

Blocked-Path Contingency (Required if Blocked)

If decision is blocked, choose one:

  1. Narrow CareConnect scope to bounded local workflows that do not depend on restricted integration.
  2. Trigger responsible deprecation path if non-duplicate value cannot be demonstrated.

Record selected contingency:

Field Value
Contingency Selected N/A in conditional mode (preselected fallback remains scope narrowing)
Trigger Condition Trigger if C1/C2 fail or partner terms violate redlines
Owner jer
Review Date 2026-03-21
Artifact Link
Legal review notes v22.0 Control C1 Legal Review
Privacy review notes v22.0 Control C2 Privacy Retention Mapping
Retention policy proposal v22.0 C2 Retention Policy Proposal
Deletion verification runbook v22.0 C2 Deletion Verification Runbook
Technical architecture assessment v22.0 Phase 0 Implementation Plan
Approval checklist update v22.0 Approval Checklist
User-owned blocker execution v22.0 Gate 0 User Action Tracker
Evidence intake templates v22.0 Gate 0 Evidence Intake Pack
Threat-model evidence v22.0 Offline/Local Data Threat Model
Decision lock memo v22.0 Step 1 Decision Locks (2026-03-09)
Activation guard evidence v22.0 Control C3 Integration Activation Guard

Final Sign-Off

  • [x] Decision outcome recorded
  • [x] Redline checklist complete
  • [x] Compensating controls (if any) assigned
  • [x] Contingency path recorded (if blocked)
  • [x] Approval checklist D6/D7 updated