v22.0 External-Claim Re-Validation Log
This log tracks re-validation of external-agent-derived claims before they can influence gate decisions.
Rule:
- No external claim may be treated as confirmed without primary-source and local-evidence review.
Source plan:
Claim Register
| Claim ID | External Claim Summary | Primary Source Citation | Local Repo Evidence Link | Validation Status (pending | validated | rejected) | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 | Integration-first trajectory should be the default strategic path | CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) | v22.0 Integration Feasibility Decision Record | rejected | jer | Rejected for Gate 0 default path: current decision is conditional integration with strict redline gates, not integration-first by default. |
| E2 | 211 API terms likely create telemetry reciprocity risk | CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) (External sources S8/S9 package) | v22.0 Integration Feasibility Decision Record | validated | jer | Validated as a material risk hypothesis requiring C1/C2 controls before activation. |
| E3 | Offline-first design needs explicit lost/stolen-device safeguards | CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) | v22.0 Offline/Local Data Threat Model | validated | jer | Validated: threat model identifies high-severity device-loss/exfiltration risks with required mitigations. |
| E4 | Directory decay is a first-order operational risk requiring monthly audits | Governance Protocol: The Kingston 150 Standard | v22.0 Phase 0 Baseline Metric Definitions | rejected | jer | Rejected as written for universal monthly cadence: current policy is monthly for crisis, quarterly for general services. Risk is valid; cadence wording was over-broad. |
| E5 | Human-assisted channels may outperform self-serve for high-need cohorts | CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) | v22.0 Non-Duplicate Value Decision Plan (H8) | validated | jer | Directionally validated; still requires pilot instrumentation evidence (M7 dependency) before quantitative claim strength increases. |
Validation Checklist Per Claim
For each claim marked validated:
- Primary source citation captured.
- Local code/docs evidence linked.
- Contradictions or limits documented.
- Decision impact explicitly stated.
Decision Impact Log
| Date | Claim ID | Validation Outcome | Impacted Decision(s) | Reviewer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-09 | E1 | rejected | D7 (contingency), integration sequencing | jer |
| 2026-03-09 | E2 | validated | D6 (redlines), C1/C2 control priority | jer |
| 2026-03-09 | E3 | validated | H7 risk handling, threat-model mitigation tracking | jer |
| 2026-03-09 | E4 | rejected | verification cadence wording and governance messaging | jer |
| 2026-03-09 | E5 | validated | H8 kept as pilot hypothesis with evidence gate | jer |
Outcome Summary
- 3/5 claims validated (
E2,E3,E5). - 2/5 claims rejected (
E1,E4) due over-broad/default assumptions not supported for Gate 0 decisions. - No rejected claim is used as gate-deciding evidence.
Completion Criteria
- [x] All claims reviewed
- [x] No
pendingclaim used as gate-deciding evidence - [x] Rejected claims documented with rationale
- [x] Summary included in Gate 0 evidence package