Skip to content

v22.0 External-Claim Re-Validation Log

This log tracks re-validation of external-agent-derived claims before they can influence gate decisions.

Rule:

  1. No external claim may be treated as confirmed without primary-source and local-evidence review.

Source plan:

  1. v22.0 Non-Duplicate Value Decision Plan

Claim Register

Claim ID External Claim Summary Primary Source Citation Local Repo Evidence Link Validation Status (pending | validated | rejected) Owner Notes
E1 Integration-first trajectory should be the default strategic path CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) v22.0 Integration Feasibility Decision Record rejected jer Rejected for Gate 0 default path: current decision is conditional integration with strict redline gates, not integration-first by default.
E2 211 API terms likely create telemetry reciprocity risk CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) (External sources S8/S9 package) v22.0 Integration Feasibility Decision Record validated jer Validated as a material risk hypothesis requiring C1/C2 controls before activation.
E3 Offline-first design needs explicit lost/stolen-device safeguards CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) v22.0 Offline/Local Data Threat Model validated jer Validated: threat model identifies high-severity device-loss/exfiltration risks with required mitigations.
E4 Directory decay is a first-order operational risk requiring monthly audits Governance Protocol: The Kingston 150 Standard v22.0 Phase 0 Baseline Metric Definitions rejected jer Rejected as written for universal monthly cadence: current policy is monthly for crisis, quarterly for general services. Risk is valid; cadence wording was over-broad.
E5 Human-assisted channels may outperform self-serve for high-need cohorts CareConnect vs 211 Objective Evaluation (2026-02-27) v22.0 Non-Duplicate Value Decision Plan (H8) validated jer Directionally validated; still requires pilot instrumentation evidence (M7 dependency) before quantitative claim strength increases.

Validation Checklist Per Claim

For each claim marked validated:

  1. Primary source citation captured.
  2. Local code/docs evidence linked.
  3. Contradictions or limits documented.
  4. Decision impact explicitly stated.

Decision Impact Log

Date Claim ID Validation Outcome Impacted Decision(s) Reviewer
2026-03-09 E1 rejected D7 (contingency), integration sequencing jer
2026-03-09 E2 validated D6 (redlines), C1/C2 control priority jer
2026-03-09 E3 validated H7 risk handling, threat-model mitigation tracking jer
2026-03-09 E4 rejected verification cadence wording and governance messaging jer
2026-03-09 E5 validated H8 kept as pilot hypothesis with evidence gate jer

Outcome Summary

  1. 3/5 claims validated (E2, E3, E5).
  2. 2/5 claims rejected (E1, E4) due over-broad/default assumptions not supported for Gate 0 decisions.
  3. No rejected claim is used as gate-deciding evidence.

Completion Criteria

  • [x] All claims reviewed
  • [x] No pending claim used as gate-deciding evidence
  • [x] Rejected claims documented with rationale
  • [x] Summary included in Gate 0 evidence package